Civil miscellaneous petition treated as a suit in which the petitioner had died before filing a substitution petition; dismissed as non-prosecuted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.263 of 2016 (5) dt.04-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.263 of 2016
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh Mr. Chandra Shekhar Verma
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
5 04-01-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, Yadubansh Prasad died but she did not get any instruction nor any instruction was given to file substitution petition.
Considering the facts aforesaid, this civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
Saurabh/-
U
Yadubansh Prasad
Birendra Kumar
Suryavlansh Prasad Gupta
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
