deed or recent document to show that petitioner inherited the property from his ancestor and he is stranger to the issue to be decided in the suit but I do not find any force in the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent No.8 as on bare perusal of the order impugned, the reasoning given by the learned Sub Judge is not acceptable. Admittedly, the documents filed by the petitioner show that the land was standing in the name of the ancestor of the petitioner. The ancestor of the petitioner executed a registered deed of Will in the year 1938. The petitioner claimed the subject matter of the suit land by virtue of inheritance. Order I Rule 10(2) C.P.C. vests power in the Court that “Court may at any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party, and on such terms as may appear to the Court just, order that the name of any party improperly joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant, be struck out, and that the name of any person who ought to have been joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant, or whose presence before the Court may be necessary in order to enable the Court effectually and completely to adjudicate upon and settle all the questions involved in the suit, be added.”
