The Court allowed permission to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No legal proposition was articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1245 of 2018
======================================================
Shailendra Kumar
.... .... Appellant/s Versus Sunil Kumar Tekriwal & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 09-10-2018 After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
Prayer is allowed. This Civil Misc. petition is, accordingly, dismissed
as withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
BKS/-
U
Shailendra Kumar
Sunil Kumar Tekriwal & Ors
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
