Disposed

Vinod Kumar v. Smt. Madhumita

Patna HC5 Oct 2018C.Misc./1215/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna, via Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.1215 of 2018, directed the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna, to dispose of a pending matrimonial suit within four months after hearing both sides.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna to dispose of the matrimonial suit within four months after hearing both sides.

Vinod Kumar Vs Smt. Madhumita — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1215 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Vinod Kumar Son of Shree Kameshwar Prasad resident of L.I.G. - 99, At & P.S. Nehru Nagar, Bhopal, M.P.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Smt. Madhumita Wife of Vinod Kumar and daughter of Dr. Kashinath Prasad residentof M.I.G. - 333, Kankarbagh Colony, Lohianagar, P.S. - Kankarbagh, Town & District Patna.

¶7

.... .... Respondent

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sunil Srivastava For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 05-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

The petitioner is husband and applicant of Matrimonial

¶12

Case No. 390 of 2013 pending in the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna. The petitioner filed this civil miscellaneous petition for direction to the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna to dispose of the matrimonial suit expeditiously in view of the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Transfer petition (Civil) No.1309 of 2012.

¶13

It appears that there is order of Hon’ble Supreme Court directing the parties to co-operate with the transferee court in expeditiously disposal of the matrimonial suit but even after lapse of five years, the matrimonial suit is still pending. It is submitted that both sides have already adduced their evidence and suit is

¶14

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1215 of 2018 (2) dt.05-10-2018

¶15

2/2

¶16

pending for argument.

¶17

Having considered the facts aforesaid, I direct the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna to dispose of the matrimonial suit after hearing both sides in accordance with law preferably within four months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶18

Accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is

¶19

disposed of.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶21

Amit/-

¶22

Vinod Kumar v. Smt. Madhumita

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar v. Smt. Madhumita

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Lal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ganga Mahto Vs Ano Devi

Vijay Mishra Vs Rajan Mishra and Ors.

Mahesh Prasad Gupta Vs Ram Narayan Gupta and Ors.

Sri Sadhu Das @ Sadhu Tanti Vs Sri Babu Narayan Sharma and Anr.

Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.