The High Court allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the miscellaneous appeal rendered infructuous by a subsequent order and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.990 of 2016
====================================================== Prabhash Kumar Sinha @ Padum & Anr .... .... Appellant/s Versus Jitendra Kumar Narayan Singh & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Prasoon Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER
3 04-09-2018 Learned counsel for the appellants is present before the Court and seeks permission to withdraw this appeal submitting that the appeal has become infructuous due to passing of the subsequent order.
Permission is granted. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
Trivedi/-
U
Prabhash Kumar Sinha @ Padum & Anr.
Jitendra Kumar Narayan Singh & Ors.
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
