The High Court of Patna dismissed the miscellaneous appeal as withdrawn after the appellant sought permission, stating that a settlement was reached between the parties out of court.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.956 of 2017
======================================================
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER
02 10-09-2018 This case has been listed under the heading ‘To be Mentioned’ at the instance of learned counsel for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal submitting that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the Court, hence the appellant do not want to pursue this appeal in future.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
Trivedi/-
U
Dhananjay Kumar
Muneshwar Kumar
Shyam Kumar
Nisha Rani
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
