In this miscellaneous appeal, the court dismissed the matter for non-prosecution as none of the appellants appeared after repeated calls, indicating disinterest in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.330 of 2015
======================================================
Versus
The Union of India Through The General Manager East Central Railway, Hajipur.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Keshari, Sr. Railway Advocate. Smt. Sudha Ambastha, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL
ORAL ORDER
repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondent is present before
the Court.
From perusal of the record, it appears that none had appeared on behalf of the appellants on the last occasion also. Thus it transpires that the appellants are not interested to prosecute this matter in future.
Accordingly, this miscellaneous appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)
mantreshwar/-
U
Sunil Kumar Malakar and others
The Union of India Through The General Manager East Central Railway, Hajipur
Prakash Chandra Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
