The High Court of Patna allowed the petitioner to withdraw Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9696 of 2000 and dismissed the petition as withdrawn in an oral order.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9696 of 2000
======================================================
Parmeshwar Dayal Sinha
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikash Moha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
5 30-11-2018
Mr. Vikash Mohan, the learned Advocate, on instructions from Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, the learned Advocate for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Praveen-II/-
U
Parmeshwar Dayal Sinha
The State of Bihar & Ors.
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
