Disposed

Bakeshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC2 Nov 2018CWJC/9076/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought compensation for land acquired for ITBP Camp. Due to a dispute over title with co-sharers and pending litigation, the court disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioner to file a petition for apportionment of compensation with the Land Acquisition Officer.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to file a petition for grant of compensation or apportionment of the amount of compensation.

Bakeshwar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9076 of 2016

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bakeshwar Singh Son of Guneshwar Singh, resident of village- Mahinathpur, Anchal + P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna 2. The Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi

¶7

The Commandant 48th BN Indo Tibetan Border Police Force MHA Govt. of India, Sisia Camp P.O. Sisia Via Korha Katihar

¶8

The Collector, Katihar

¶9

The Additional Collector, Katihar 6. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Katihar 7. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Katihar 8. The Circle Officer, Korha, Katihar

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish, Advocate For Res. Nos.1 & 4 to 8 : Mr. Fakhruddin Ali Ahmad, AC to AAG-12 For Res. Nos.2 & 3 : Mr. Anshay Bahadur Mathur, Advocate

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 02-11-2018 Heard both sides.

¶18

The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a direction to the respondents including the District Land Acquisition Officer, Katihar for payment of compensation for the acquisition of the land of the petitioner.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land of the petitioner of Khata No.554, Khesra No.2112, Area 56 Decimals, situated in Mauza Sisia Mahinathpur, Anchal Korha, P.S. Korha, District Katihar was acquired for construction of ITBP Camp. The amount of compensation has

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.9076 of 2016(2) dt.02-11-2018 2/3

¶21

also been received by the District Land Acquisition Officer but the District Land Acquisition Officer is not paying the amount of compensation. Admittedly there is a dispute between the petitioner and other co-sharers-step brothers of the petitioner and the litigation for mutation of their names in the Record of Rights was going on. The Member Administrative, Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna in BLT Case No.164 of 2015 dismissed the petition of his step brothers and confirmed the order of the Additional Collector passed in Mutation Revision Case No.661 of 2001-02 by which the name of the petitioner has been mutated.

¶22

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that since there is a dispute between the petitioner and his step brothers with regard to the title of the land, the District Land Acquisition Officer deposited the compensation amount in the PD Account of the Treasury and unless the dispute with regard to entitlement of compensation is resolved by a competent civil court, the compensation cannot be paid to any of the parties.

¶23

Having considered the facts aforesaid, I dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the petitioner to file a petition before the Bihar Land Acquisition Officer for grant of compensation or apportionment of the amount of compensation.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.9076 of 2016(2) dt.02-11-2018 3/3

¶25

If such petition is filed, the District Land Acquisition Officer, Katihar shall refer the matter either to the referral judge or before the Tribunal for deciding the question of apportionment of the compensation amount.

¶26

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶27

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶28

S.KUMAR/-

¶29

Bakeshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bakeshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Kumar Rai Alias Janak Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mritunjay Singh Vs Suresh Prasad Gupta and Ors.

Bajme Ara Begum Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Masudan Ram Vs Usha Devi and Ors.

Shambhu Prasad Vs Resma Devi and Anr.

Dr. Uday Shankar Mishra and Anr. Vs Vijay Shankar Mishra and Ors.