The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition dated 01-10-2018 for non-substitution of the petitioner, who failed to file a substitution petition of legal heirs for over three years after time was initially granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8572 of 2000 (9) dt.01-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8572 of 2000
====================================================== Ram Chandra Mahto .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hari Shankar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp7) Mr. Sachchidanand Singh
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
9 01-10-2018 Vide order dated 19.05.2015, two weeks time was allowed to substitute the legal heirs of sole petitioner but even after lapse of more than three years, substitution petition of the petitioner has not been filed.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for nonsubstitution of the petitioner.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
Saurabh/-
U
Ram Chandra Mahto
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
