This oral order dismisses a writ petition seeking to quash an order rejecting impleadment, holding that the underlying B.L.T. case is disposed of, rendering the petition infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7983 of 2016
======================================================
Shankar Mandal & Ors
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Bansh Dubey For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP9- Din Bandhu Singh Mr. S. D. Sanjay, Sr. advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 27-11-2018
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that B.L.T. case No. 3/ 2015 has already been disposed of and, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous.
In this view of the fact, this writ petition is dismissed as has become infructuous.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
BKS/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as having become infructuous given the underlying B.L.T. case has been disposed of.
Shankar Mandal & Ors
State Of Bihar & Ors
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
