Allowed

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Apr 2018CWJC/7245/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a writ petition to set aside an order cancelling the petitioner's Fair Price Shop license. The court held that the show cause notice was non-compliant and reversed the cancellation order, remanding the matter for a fresh decision after a proper hearing.

What did the court decide?

The order cancelling the license is set aside and the matter is remanded to issue a proper show cause notice. Supplies to the petitioner are restored without delay.

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court CWJC No.7245 of 2018 dt.18-04-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7245 of 2018

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Sanjay Kumar, S/o Late Surendra Baitha, Resident of Bamauli Bujurg, P.S.Paliganj, District- Patna.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶10

The Sub Divisional Officer, Paliganj, Patna.

¶11

.... .... Respondents

¶12

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Anujit Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC-4

¶13

===========================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-04-2018

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶16

counsel for the respondents.

¶17

The present writ petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 02.04.2018 contained in Memo No. 112/Aa passed by learned Sub-Divisional Officer, Paliganj by which the license of the petitioner has been cancelled.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that insufficient opportunity of only three days was granted for filing show cause and the impugned order has been passed as the petitioner was unable to file the show cause within the stipulated time. It is submitted that the petitioner’s case is squarely covered by a decision of this Court in the case of Smt. Fulpati Devi Vs. The State of Bihar, 2013(1) PLJR 718

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.7245 of 2018 dt.18-04-2018

¶20

wherein it has been observed as follows:

¶21

“3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not know about the notice as she was ill during the period. Hence, she did not file show cause and in her absence the Sub-Divisional Officer passed the impugned order cancelling her licence. He also submits that in appeal petitioner had brought this issue as ground no. (B) in the memo of appeal but the Collector has not considered the same and has brushed aside the ground taken by the petitioner and held that the ground of illness taken by the petitioner appears to be ‘Post Thought’. He submits that illness or no illness, only three days time was allowed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, which was very short, and thereafter, he passed final orders within one week, without ensuring that notice was served on her.

¶22

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be correct. From the impugned order of the Sub-Divisional Officer also it does not appear that he has take care to ascertain service of notice was affected on the petitioner or not. The fact that after issue of notice on 16th of November, 2011 he passed final orders on 22nd of November, 2011 without mentioning in his order that the notice had been served on the petitioner, shows that he acted in hot haste.”

¶23

It is further submitted that the show cause notice did not indicate the proposed cancellation of the licence which is a mandatory requirement in terms of Clause 7(ii) of the Bihar Fair Price Shop Order, 2007. Reliance is placed on Prasuani Khirodhar Primary

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.7245 of 2018 dt.18-04-2018

¶25

Agriculture Co-operative Society Ltd. & Ors. vs. The State of Bihar and others, 2015(3) PLJR 189.

¶26

In the above view of the matter, the impugned order contained in Memo No. 112/Aa dated 02.04.2018 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Paliganj, Patna (Annexure-3) is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Paliganj, Patna (respondent no. 3) to issue an appropriate show cause notice and take a fresh decision in the matter after grant of reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law. Supplies to the petitioner shall be restored without delay until fresh orders are passed by the respondent no. 3.

¶27

The writ petition stands allowed.

¶28

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶29

Md. Ibrarul/BT

¶30

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	02.05.2018
Transmission Date	N.A.

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shambhu Kumar Vs The Food And Consumer Protection Department Through The Principal Secretary and Ors.

Subash Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Binay Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rinku Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Smt. Siya Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.