Dismissed

Ehteshamuddin v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Patna HC19 Feb 2018CWJC/7216/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking appointment as a Scribe, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Library Executive Committee for consideration based on an existing liberty granted in a related case, without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with liberty to approach the Library Executive Committee; no opinion expressed on merits.

Ehteshamuddin Vs The Union Of India and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 7216 of 2015

¶2

===========================================================

¶3

Ehteshamuddin S/o late Abdul Khalique Resident of Mohalla- Mainpura Masjid Gate No. 35, Rajapul , PS Patliputra District Patna

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Tourism and Culture, Government of India, New Delhi.

¶7

The Divisional commissioner, Patna in charge of the Director Khuda Baksh Oriental Public Library, Patna

¶8

Khuda Baksh Oriental Public Library, through its Chairman, the Governor of Bihar, Raj Bhawan , Patna

¶9

Shri Javed Ashraf Posted as D.D.O. in the Khuda Baksh Oriental Public Library, situated at Ashok Raj Path, Patna-4.

¶10

.... .... Respondent/s

¶11

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr Subodh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms Kanak Verma, CGC

¶12

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

¶13

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶14

Date: 19-02-2018

¶15

Heard counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

¶16

2 Petitioner submits that he is entitled to be considered

¶17

for being appointed as Scribe having regular status in the respondentLibrary. Respondents have filed an affidavit wherein they have disputed the claim of the petitioner.

¶18

3 Counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court towards one order dated 18.l0.2016 passed in CWJC No 143 of 2016 wherein the Executive Committee of the Library has been directed to consider whether there is any requirement of the services

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.7216 of 2015 dt.19-02-2018

¶20

2/2

¶21

of the petitioners therein and, if so, to take a final decision in the matter regarding the claim of the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner of this case may also be permitted to approach the Executive Committee of the Library and if he is entitled to similar treatment as the petitioners of the said writ petition, the respondents may consider the claim of this petitioner also in accordance with law.

¶22

4 In view of the aforesaid liberty, no further direction needs to be granted in the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty, as aforesaid without expressing any opinon on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner.

¶23

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶24

M.E.H. /-

¶25

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
UploadingDate	20.02.2018
Transmission Date	NA

Ehteshamuddin v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ehteshamuddin v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baleshwar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Raj Kumar Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Pintu Chouhan Vs The State Of Bihar

Nishan Kumar @ Nishant Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Tarkeshwar Thakur and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gulshan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar