Wakil Kumar Rai v. the Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ application after stating grievance was redressed. Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7100 of 2011
======================================================
Wakil Kumar Rai, son of Sri Bindeshwar Rai, resident of village Baghra, P.S. Sahpur Pattori, District Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. N.A. Shamsi (Asgi) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER
7 19-11-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and seeks permission to withdraw this application.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Nilu Agrawal, J)
Rajesh/-
U
Wakil Kumar Rai
Union of India
Nilu Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court