Ram Pukar Rajak v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court despite being called to explain.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6367 of 2004 (2) dt.15-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6367 of 2004
====================================================== Ram Pukar Rajak
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
2 15-02-2018 None appears for the petitioner.
In presence of counsel for the State, the writ petition
is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Prakash/-
U
RAM PUKAR RAJAK
THE STATE OF BIHAR
MADHURESH PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court