Nakul Prasad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.63 of 2018
======================================================
Nakul Prasad, Son of Late Rajendra Prasad, resident of Village- Arhit, P.O. Daulatpur, Police Station- Modanganj, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.P. GUPTA, GP-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 13-02-2018 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that the writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, it is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
sanjeet/-
U
Nakul Prasad
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Panchayat Raj Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Jehanabad
The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Jehanabad
The Block Development Officer, Modanganj, District- Jehanabad
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court