Disposed

Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC5 Jan 2018CWJC/480/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, a Revenue Karmachari, filed a writ petition seeking direction for payment of salary withheld since October 2008. This Court directed the Circle Officer, Kahra to consider the grievance and pass a speaking order within six days of receipt. No other substantive examination was conducted.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Circle Officer, Kahra, to consider the grievance regarding non-payment of salary and pass a speaking order within six weeks.

Chandan Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.480 of 2017

¶2

====================================================== Chandan Kumar Singh \S/o Late Ram Naresh Singh Resident of VillageMahpura, Post-Mainagram, P.S.-Mahisi, District-Saharsa

¶3

.... .... Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna

¶6

The Principal Secretary, Revenue Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Collector, Saharsa.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer, Saharsa.

¶9

Anchal Adhikari, Kahra, District-Saharsa.

¶10

Anchal Adhikari, Salkhua, District-Saharsa.

¶11

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Mallika Mazumdar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy- Gp18

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 05-01-2018 Heard Mrs. Mallika Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, learned G.P.18 for the State.

¶15

The petitioner has worked on the post of Revenue Karmachari and his grievance is that he has not been paid salary since October, 2008.

¶16

Initially, the petitioner was posted under the Circle Officer, Salkua since after his appointment on 2.10.2006 in the district of Saharsa and where he continued until 24.4.2015 where after he has been transferred to Kahra within the same district. It is the complaint of the petitioner that in between though the petitioner was put under suspension but the same was revoked on

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.480 of 2017 (2) dt.05-01-2018

¶18

2/2

¶19

20.4.2015 yet the salary has not been released and the petitioner continues to work without any salary.

¶20

Mr. Roy, learned counsel for the State counsel informs that despite communication, he has not been received any instruction from the Circle Officer, Kahra.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of grievance raised, I deem it proper to dispose of the writ petition with the direction to the Circle Officer, Kahra to consider the grievance of the petitioner regarding nonpayment of his salary and dispose of the same by speaking order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶22

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶23

N.H./-

¶24

Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hansraj Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Kameshwar Prasad Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Urmila Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Ibrahim Siddique Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anil Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.