Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application. The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed the application as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.39 of 2017 (2) dt.02-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.39 of 2017
======================================================
Rakesh Ranjan, son of Raminjor Sharma, resident of Village- Shamser Nagar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Nashrul Hoda Khan, SC-1
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
02/ 02-11-2018 Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed
as withdrawn.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
DKS/-
U
Rakesh Ranjan
The State of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
