Allowed

Dhrub @ Dhruv Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC26 Feb 2018CWJC/3516/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows a writ petition seeking release of a Mahindra Scorpio vehicle seized for excise violation. The court orders release upon furnishing two sureties to the District Magistrate, subject to conditions regarding vehicle availability and non-alienation during proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Release of the seized Mahindra Scorpio vehicle on furnishing two sureties with the District Magistrate, subject to conditions of availability and non-alienation.

Dhrub @ Dhruv Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Property and Title | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3516 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dhrub @ Dhruv Prasad Singh, son of Late Ramchandra Singh, resident of Sukhpur, Ward No. 13, P.S. Sukhpur, P.O. Sukhpur, District- Supaul

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Registration, Prohibition and Excise, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Collector, Supaul

¶8

The Excise Superintendent, Supaul

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girijish Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. KUMAR MANISH- SC5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶12

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶13

2 26-02-2018 This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Mahindra Scorpio Car) bearing Registration No. BR 11 H 9457 which has been seized due to violation of the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 67 of 2018.

¶14

It is common ground that in various cases, similar petitions have been allowed and pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings, seized vehicle has been directed to be released.

¶15

Keeping in view the aforesaid, pending finalization of the confiscation and criminal proceedings, the vehicle in question, shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing two sureties

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.3516 of 2018(2) dt.26-02-2018 2/2

¶17

to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Supaul within one week from the date of furnishing the sureties, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall make available the vehicle in question before the authority concerned as and when directed and further that he shall undertake not to alienate the vehicle or deal with it in any manner whatsoever during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government.

¶18

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

¶19

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶20

( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶21

spandey/-

¶22

Dhrub @ Dhruv Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhrub @ Dhruv Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Arjun Pandit

Asfar Sayeed Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Tripurari Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhirgu Saw and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mangal Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.