Disposed

Manoj Kumar Soni v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC16 Apr 2018CWJC/3259/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking setting aside of proceedings under the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an objection petition within three weeks, halting coercive action in the meantime.

What did the court decide?

Granted liberty to file objection petition within three weeks; stayed coercive action pending its disposal.

Manoj Kumar Soni Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3259 of 2018

¶3

=========================================================== Manoj Kumar Soni, son of Late Ram Padarath Sah, Resident of villageMohanpur (Sadar Bazar Near Masjid), P.S.- Jamalpur, District - Munger.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Munger.

¶9

The Superintendent of Excise, Munger.

¶10

The Certificate Officer, Munger.

¶11

.... .... Respondents

¶12

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Jha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Kumar Manish, SC5

¶14

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT

¶15

Date: 16-04-2018

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned

¶17

counsel for the State.

¶18

The present writ petition has been filed for the

¶19

following reliefs –

¶20

“(i) For commanding and directing the respondents, to Set Aside entire proceeding of Certificate Case No. 10/14-15, Pending before the learned Certificate Officer, District Munger.

¶21

(ii) For holding that, there is apparent non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Bihar and Orissa, Pubic Demand Recovery Act.

¶22

(iii) For commanding and directing the respondents, to stay certificate notice dt. 26.8.2014, issued in Certificate Case No. 10/2014-15.

¶23

(iv)For commanding and directing the respondents, to

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.3259 of 2018 dt.16-04-2018

¶25

2/3

¶26

stop the execution of the warrant of arrest dt. 30.11.2017, as well as order dated 6.1.2018, issued by Certificate Officer, Munger, in Certificate Case No. 10/14-15.

¶27

(v) For any other relief(s) for which Petitioner is found entitled in the eye of law.”

¶28

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the entire proceedings in Certificate Case No. 10 of 2014-15 against the petitioner in terms of Section 7 of the Bihar & Orissa Public Demands recovery Act (for short, “the Act”) for recovery of the dues amounting to Rs. 3,79,14,440/- are wholly illegal and liable to be quashed.

¶29

Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the petitioner does not appear to have filed any objection petition under Section 9 of the Act denying his liability, and as such there is no illegality in the action of the Respondents.

¶30

Be that as it may, with the consent of parties, the present writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file his objection petition under Section 9 of the Act within a period of three weeks from today, which, if done, shall be disposed of by the Certificate Officer on its own merits within a further period of four weeks thereafter in accordance with law and in terms of Section 10 of the said Act.

¶31

It is made clear that until disposal of such petition, if filed, the Certificate Officer, Munger shall not resort to any coercive

¶32

Patna High Court CWJC No.3259 of 2018 dt.16-04-2018

¶33

3/3

¶34

action for recovery of the dues against the petitioner in Certificate Case

¶35

No. 10 of 2014-15.

¶36

The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶37

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶38

B.T/Chandran

¶39

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	21.04.2018
Transmission Date	N.A.

Manoj Kumar Soni v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar Soni v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Tara Rajat Enclave Pvt. Ltd. Madhopur Vs The Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Manish Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Diwakar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s J. P. Singh and Brothers Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Niranjan Sah @ Niranjan Kesri Vs The South Bihar Power Holding Company Ltd. and Ors.

Hira Lal Sona Vs The South Bihar Power Holding Company Ltd. and Ors.