Disposed

Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi @ Sunita Dave v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 Jan 2018CWJC/2941/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court observed the petitioner's grievance regarding the uncompleted selection process for Anganbari Sevika. The court directed the petitioner to file a representation before the District Programme Officer, who was held competent as the first instance authority, to be disposed of within three months.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed with liberty to petitioner to file representation before District Programme Officer within fortnight for consideration within 3 months.

Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi @ Sunita Dave Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2941 of 2016

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi @ Sunita Dave Wife of Sri Ram Paswan Resident of village- Naropatti, P.O- Dihuli Bujurg, P.S. and Block- Sakra, District Muzaffapur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar through the Chief , Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶6

The Principal Secretary, Social and welfare Department , Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur

¶10

The Child Development Project Officer, Sakra, District Muzaffarpur.

¶11

The lady Supervisor, Child Development Project, Sakra, Block Muzaffarpur.

¶12

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dihuli, Ishak, Block Sakra, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

¶13

The Ward Member, Ward no. 13, Gram Panchyat Raj, Dihuli, Ishak, Block Sakra, District Muzaffarpur.

¶14

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gautam Bose, AAG 8

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 15-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

The grievance of the petitioner is that a selection process initiated on 8.12.2014 for appointment of Anganbari Sevika of Centre No.75, Ward No.13, Gram Panchayat Raj, Dihuli Ishak in the District of Muzaffarpur vide Annexure-1 has not reached its conclusion.

¶18

Although a representation is filed before the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur but under the guidelines the competent authority to examine the matter at the first instance would be the

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.2941 of 2016 (2) dt.15-01-2018

¶20

2/2

¶21

District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur the respondent No.5 herein.

¶22

In the circumstances, I deem it proper to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to raise her grievance before the District Programme Officer, Muzaffarpur and it goes without saying that any such representation being filed by the petitioner within fortnight from today shall be considered and disposed of by the District Programme Officer in accordance with law within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order by speaking order.

¶23

The writ petition is disposed of.

¶24

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶25

Bibhash/-

¶26

Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi @ Sunita Dave v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Kumari @ Sunita Devi @ Sunita Dave v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s. Broad Son Commodities Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Rampatia and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Awdhesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rinki Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.