Allowed

Ram Kishore Mishra v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Sept 2018CWJC/24777/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition regarding pension and retirement benefits, the High Court of Patna disposed of the matter by directing the District Programme Officer to examine the petitioner's representation. The officer must verify if the case is covered by prior orders, obtaining necessary approvals, and decide within four months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Programme Officer to examine petitioner's representation, verify coverage under prior orders, and pass necessary order within four months.

Ram Kishore Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24777 of 2013

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ram Kishore Mishra Son Of Raj Dhar Mishra Resident Of Village & P.O. Naokothi, Police Station - Bakhari, District - Begusarai, Retired While Working As An Assistant Teacher From Govt. Primary School - Begumpur, Anchal - Naokothi, District – Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State Of Bihar

¶6

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The Deputy Secretary Finance (Pay Fixation) Department , Government Of Bihar, Patna

¶9

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna

¶10

The District Magistrate, Begusarai

¶11

The Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Begusarai

¶12

The District Education Officer, Begusarai

¶13

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Begusarai

¶14

The District Treasury Officer, Begusarai

¶15

The District Accounts Officer, Begusarai

¶16

The Headmaster Cum Drawing And Disbursing Officer Govt. Primary School - Begumpur, Anchal - Naokothi, District – Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s

¶17

======================================================

¶18

Appearance :

¶19

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mirtunjay Kumar, Advocate

¶20

======================================================

¶21

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT

¶22

Date : 17-09-2018

¶23

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶24

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶25

This writ petition was filed on 11.12.2013 with two advance copies to the office of the Advocate General. Unfortunately, even after five years the respondents have not filed any counter affidavit.

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition is covered by the orders of this Court dated 1.5.1995 passed in CWJC No. 3633 of 1994 and 02.07.2009 passed in CWJC No. 13615 of 2001 as contained in Annexures- 4

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.24777 of 2013 dt.17-09-2018 2/2

¶28

and 5 respectively. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has filed representation addressed to the District Programme Officer (Establishment) Begusarai on 18.6.2012, which has not been disposed of as yet.

¶29

Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment) Begusarai to examine the case of the petitioner and if the case of the petitioner is covered by the orders Annexures- 4 and 5, necessary order may be passed by the respondents on the representation of the petitioner. It is clarified here that while taking decision the District Programme Officer (Establishment) Begusarai is required to obtain approval of the Director, Primary Education while granting consequential benefits to the petitioner. Final decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents within a maximum period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶30

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶31

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶32

spandey/-
AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	18.09.2018
Transmission Date

Ram Kishore Mishra v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kishore Mishra v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Devanand Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dina Nath Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rameshwar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sangita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Mohan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.