Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2430 of 2012
========================================== Nakul Yadav Son Of Late Rampat Yadav Resident Of Piparpati, P.S. Jiyanpur, District - Ajamgardh (U.P.), Presently Posted As A.S.I., R.P.F., Crime Intelligence Bureau, Ara, District - Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
==========================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar, Adv For the Resp. (Railways) : Mr. Abhinay Raj, Adv
==========================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 04-12-2018 Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.
Permission is accorded.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Shageer/-
U
Nakul Yadav
Union Of India
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
