Disposed

Pankaj Kumar Giri v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC13 Dec 2018CWJC/23995/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge disposed of a writ seeking an original certificate. The court directed the university to issue the certificate and marks-sheet, aligning with the directions issued by the Division Bench in analogous pending cases.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the University to issue the original certificate of passing and Registration Slip and to consider the application for Migration certificate.

Pankaj Kumar Giri Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23995 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pankaj Kumar Giri, Son of Nathuni Giri, Resident of village Sikanderpur P.S. G.B, Nagar, Tarwara District-Siwan.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Jai Prakash University, through its Vice Chancellor, Chapra Bihar..

¶8

The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, Bihar.

¶9

The Examination Controller, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, Bihar.

¶10

The Principal, D.B.S. D.D. College, Rampur (Kadna), Garkha, Chapra.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

=============== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the University For the Respondent/s ===============	==== : : : ====	=================================== Mr. Vijay Singh Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti Mr. Amit Bhushan, AC to GP-17 ===================================
CORAM: HONOU SINGH	RAB	LE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 13-12-2018

¶15

This writ application has been filed seeking direction to the respondent, Jai Prakash Vishwa Vidyalaya (University), Chapra, Saran, for issuance of original certificate of passing of Bachelor of Science, Zoology (Hons.) Examination 2010-13 as well as Registration Slip of the University to the petitioner.

¶16

In similar circumstance, certain examinees of the University had approached this Court seeking similar direction by filing writ applications. Four of such writ applications were heard together, being C.W.J.C. No. 5034 of 2017 (Rajeev Ranjan vs. Jai Prakash Vishwa Vidyalaya (University), Chapra) and three other analogous cases, which had been dismissed by common judgment and order dated 05.09.2018

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.23995 of 2018(2) dt.13-12-2018 2/3

¶18

with the following observations:-

¶19

“It is clear from the above that only registered students of the University can be allowed to appear for B.A./B.Sc./B.Com. (General/Honours) Examination. The circumstance in which these petitioners were allowed to appear for the examination, without registration numbers having been mentioned in the Part-III examination, is unknown, but the reason is obvious.”

¶20

Appeals were preferred against the said judgment and order giving rise to L.P.A. Nos. 1402 of 2017, 1403 of 2017 and 1404 of 2017, which have been disposed of by judgment and order dated 21.06.2018. The Division Bench, while disposing of the appeals, considering extra ordinary circumstances has issued following directions to release their results:-

¶21

“Since the University authorities have allowed these appellants to pursue their studies whatever has been its worth and have held their examination and they have been promoted from one year to the next and have also finally taken the examination for the final year, no purpose would be served by allowing the University to hold back the results or issuance of marks-sheet of these students for the final

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.23995 of 2018(2) dt.13-12-2018 3/3

¶23

year of their studies.

¶24

The Court, therefore, under the extraordinary circumstances and keeping in mind the future of the students who may also be a victim rather than the conspirator to the whole thing are given the benefit of doubt. The University authorities are directed to release the result and issue the marks-sheet in favour of these appellants within a period of four week from the date of production of a copy of this order.”

¶25

Learned counsel for the University does not dispute that case of the present petitioner is identical to the case of the appellant of L.P.A. No. 1402 of 2017 and other analogous cases. This writ application is accordingly disposed of with the similar direction, as given by the Division Bench in case of Rajeev Ranjan (supra).

¶26

This application stands disposed of.

¶27

If the petitioner applies for Migration certificate, the University shall consider the same in accordance with law.

¶28

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶29

Ashish/-

¶30

Pankaj Kumar Giri v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar Giri v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Yugeshwar Mahanth Pathak Sanskrit Mahavidyalaya Vs Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University and Ors.

Vishal Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bihar Vidyapeeth Uchh Madhyamik Vidyalay Vs The Bihar School Examination Board and Ors.

Dhanji Yadav Vs Veer Kunwar Singh University

Vimal Bibhuti College Of Education At D P S Bhagalpur Campus Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Gazi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.