Writ application by a school teacher dismissed as having become infructuous after respondents confirmed the petitioner was extended the regular pay scale in the counter affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21746 of 2014
======================================================
Rupesh Kumar Sharma, Son of Late Dinesh Chandra Sharma, Resident of village- Balhadih, P.O.- Garia, P.S.- Bangaon, District- Saharsa.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Obaidur Rahman, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar, AC to AAG-IX
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 29-10-2018 In view of the stand taken by the respondents in the
counter affidavit, wherein it is stated that the petitioner has been extended the regular pay scale, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application.
The writ application stands disposed of as having
become infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Uday/-
U
Rupesh Kumar Sharma
The State of Bihar
The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar
The District Education Officer, Saharsa
The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Saharsa
The Block Education Officer, Sattar Katiyya
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
