Disposed

Soti Ray v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Food And Civil Supplies Department, Government Of Bihar, P

Patna HC3 Apr 2018CWJC/2162/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a PDS licence. The Court directed the appellate authority (Collector, Madhepura) to dispose of the pending supply appeal filed by the petitioner within eight weeks, ensuring an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Directed the appellate authority to consider and dispose of the pending supply appeal filed by the petitioner within eight weeks after granting an opportunity of hearing.

Soti Ray Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court CWJC No.2162 of 2018 dt.03-04-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2162 of 2018

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Soti Ray, S/o Ramphal Ray, R/o Vill.- Gangapur Lutna Tola, P.S. Alamnagar, Dist.- Madhepura.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Secretary Food and Civil Supplies Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

¶11

The District Supply Officer Madhepura.

¶12

The Sub-Divisional Officer Udakishunganj, District- Madhepura.

¶13

The Block Supply Officer-cum-Marketing Officer of Alamnagar Block Dist.Madhepura.

¶14

.... .... Respondents

¶15

===========================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. S. RAZA AHMAD- AAG5

¶18

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT

¶19

Date: 03-04-2018

¶20

The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the learned Collector, Madhepura, the appellate authority, to dispose of the Appeal Case No. 05 of 2017 filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 04.02.2017 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Udakishunganj, District Madhepura cancelling the PDS licence of the petitioner at an early date in terms of the provisions of Targeted PDS Control Order, 2016.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering that the Supply Appeal against the impugned order of

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.2162 of 2018 dt.03-04-2018

¶23

cancellation has already been filed on 16.02.2017, this Court is not inclined to enter into the merits of the matter.

¶24

The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the concerned appellate authority that the Supply Appeal dated 16.02.2017, said to have been filed against the order of cancellation passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Udakishunganj, District Madhepura vide memo no. 397-2 dated 04.02.2017 (Annexure-7), if pending before him, be considered and disposed of on its own merits after grant of an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously and in any event preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment.

¶25

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶26

Chandran/BT

¶27

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	16.04.2018
Transmission Date	NA

Soti Ray v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Food And Civil Supplies Department, Government Of Bihar, P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Soti Ray v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Food And Civil Supplies Department, Government Of Bihar, P

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bagaha Contractors Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director Niraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Upendra Kumar Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Umesh Kumar Sharma Vs The Regional Manager Bihar Gramin Bank and Ors.

Dilip Kumar Kedia Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arun Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sri Umesh Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.