Disposed

Dhananjay Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC2 Jan 2018CWJC/19820/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court heard a writ petition challenging salary admissible by a Cooperative Bank. The court observed that no writ lies against a cooperative society. Permission was accorded for the withdrawal of the petition to seek alternate remedies, and the writ was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted for withdrawal of the writ petition to pursue alternate remedies.

Dhananjay Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Cooperative Societies | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court CWJC No.19820 of 2016 (2) dt.02-01-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19820 of 2016

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dhananjay Kumar Singh, Son of Late Narendra Prasad Singh, Resident of village - Shivpur Kunal, P.S. Pakri Dayal, District - East Champaran.

¶5

Devendra Rai, Son of Late Baidya Nath Rai, Resident of Churma, P.S. Pakri Dayal, District- East Champaran.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Registrar Cooperative Societies Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Registrar Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Managing Director, Bihar State of Cooperative Bank Limited, Patna.

¶11

The Managing Director, the Motihari Cooperative Bank Limited, Bank Road, Bhawanipur Zirat, Motihari, District – Motihari.

¶12

The District Cooperative Officer cum Chairman, Compassionate Appointment Committee, Motihari Central Cooperative Bank Limited Motihari, (East Champaran).

¶13

The Board of Directors, Motihari Central Cooperative Bank Limited, DistrictMotihari through it's Chairman.

¶14

.... .... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.

¶17

Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv.

¶18

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajeev Sshekhar, AC to GP-13 For the Respondent-Bank: Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Adv.

¶19

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER

¶20

2 02-01-2018 Heard the parties.

¶21

A dispute between the petitioners and the Cooperative Bank as regarding the salary admissible has reached this Court. Undisputedly no writ lies against a cooperative society.

¶22

Faced thus, after some arguments, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this writ petition to enable the petitioners to take recourse to such other remedy as may be available to them in law.

¶23

Permission is accorded.

¶24

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

¶25

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶26

SKPathak/-

¶27

Dhananjay Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Santosh Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Parmatma Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Parmbir Singh Vs The Department Of Industries and Ors.

Akhilesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shubham Srivastava and Anr. Vs Punjab National Bank Through Its General Manager and Ors.