The High Court at Patna disposed of a civil writ petition filed by Pashupati Nath Pandey against state education officials as infructuous, accepted on counsel's submission that the grievance had already been redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19489 of 2015
======================================================
Pashupati Nath Pandey, Son of- Shree Paras Nath Pandey, Resident of villageDighwalia, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 06-12-2018 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and as such the present writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Pashupati Nath Pandey
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Education, Govt. of Bihar
The Joint Secretary, Department of Education Govt. of Bihar
The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education. Govt. of Bihar
The District Education Officer, Siwan
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
