Disposed

Raghubansh Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC5 Oct 2018CWJC/19376/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought approval for the newly constituted Governing Body of Akhoda College. The High Court directed the Director (Academics) to consider the grievance and decide within four weeks if a fresh representation is filed within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Director (Academics) to consider the petitioner's grievance and take appropriate decision; open to file fresh representation within two weeks.

Raghubansh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19376 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Raghubansh Singh S/o Ramkeshwar Singh R/o Billage & P.O.-Pilchhi, P.S.Daudnagar, Dist.-Aurangabad.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resource Govt. of BIhar, Patna.

¶7

The Chairman the Bihar School Examination Board, Higher Secondary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director the Bihar School Examination Board, Higher Secondary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Alka Verma Mr. Navnit Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore, AC to SC-13 For BSEB : Mr. Manish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 05-10-2018 This application has been filed seeking direction to the Bihar School Examination Board to approve the newly constituted Governing Body and Managing Committee of Akhoda College, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, which, according to the petitioner, was constituted in the light of direction issued by the Director (Academics) of the Board. My attention has been drawn to the letter dated 28.04.2018 written by the petitioner to the Director (Academics) of the Board, which is a representation filed by the petitioner in this regard.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite lapse of nearly six months, no decision has been taken.

¶13

Patna High Court CWJC No.19376 of 2018(2) dt.05-10-2018 2/2

¶14

Considering the nature of the grievance, the petitioner has raised and the fact that the petitioner has approached the Board by filing representation for approval of newly constituted Governing Body and Managing Committee of the college, I dispose it of with a direction to the Director (Academics) to consider the grievance of the petitioner and take appropriate decision in accordance with law. It will be open to the petitioner to file a fresh representation in this regard. If the petitioner files such representation within two weeks from today, the concerned respondents will be obliged to dispose it of within four weeks thereafter.

¶15

This application stands disposed of.

¶16

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶17

Pawan/Ragini

¶18

Raghubansh Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raghubansh Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sita Ram Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Suresh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manish Kumar Roshan Vs Jai Prakash University and Ors.

Avinash Kumar Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.