A petition in the Civil Writ Jurisdiction wherein the petitioner's counsel submitted that the grievance was redressed during pendency, leading to the disposal of the writ petition by the High Court of Judicature at Patna.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19099 of 2016
=========================================================== Daroga Prasad Singh Son of late Mosafir Singh Resident of Village and Post Office- Bajitpur, Police Station- Karpi, District- Arwal.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents (SBI) : Mrs. Namrata Mishra, Advocate
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 18-08-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State Bank
of India.
during the pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Anjani/-
AFR/NAFR U
Daroga Prasad Singh
The State Bank of India
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
