The High Court disposed of the writ application, holding that the petitioner succeeded after examining records regarding the status of private respondent No.9 in the counter affidavit filed by the Vice Chancellor.
The writ application is disposed off as the petitioner has succeeded based on the records examined in the counter affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1790 of 2015
======================================================
Binod Shankar Yadav S/O Late Devendra Narayan Yadav Resident of Main Road Muraliganj,Ward no.9, P.O+P.S-Murliganj, Distt.-Madhepura
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surinder Kumar, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC4-MD. RAISUL HAQUE ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
10 24-01-2018
In view of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Vice Chancellor of B.N. Mandal University, which throws up the status of private respondent No.9 after due examination of the records, the petitioner has already succeeded. Therefore, this writ application stands disposed off. The decision emerging from the exercise done by the Vice Chancellor will take its course.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
Pawan/-
U
Binod Shankar Yadav
State of Bihar
Vice- Chancellor, Bhupendra Narain Mandal University
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
