The Bench dismissed the writ petition because no one appeared for the petitioner and there was no explanation provided for the delay in removing defects.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of explanation regarding delay and non-appearance by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16482 of 2018
===========================================================
Ramdeo Rai, S/o Late Govind Rai, Resident of Village- Boksa, P.O. Boksa, P.S. Buxar (Muffasil), District- Buxar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 24-08-2018
Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
are present.
has been caused in removing the defects, the writ petition stands dismissed.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
P. Kumar
AFR/NAFR U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for removal of defects stands allowed or dismissed due to lack of explanation regarding delay.
Ramdeo Rai
The State of Bihar
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
