Oral order disposing of a writ petition concerning public service appointments. The court found the case infructuous for one petitioner and dismissed it as withdrawn for the other.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15915 of 2010
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindhyachal Singh For the State : Mr. Brajesh Kumar, AC to AAG-4 For the B.P.S.C. : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
counsel for the B.P.S.C and the learned counsel for the State.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Petitioner No. 2 has already been granted appointment hence, the present writ petition has become infructuous qua the Petitioner No. 2.
As far as the Petitioner No. 1 is concerned, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ
Patna High Court CWJC No.15915 of 2010(5) dt.30-07-2018 2/2
petition.
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of having become infructuous qua the Petitioner No. 2 and as far as the Petitioner No. 1 is concerned, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
ajay gupta/-
U
Ajit Kumar S/O Baleshwar Prasad
Md. Irfan Alam S/O Abdhi Samad
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
