The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time, based on the submission by the petitioner's counsel.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15551 of 2001
Versus
Patna High Court CWJC No.15551 of 2001 (8) dt.17-09-2018
2/3
P.S. Minapur.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Uma Kant Shukla, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
8 17-09-2018 Mr. Uma Kant Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that due to efflux of time, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15551 of 2001 (8) dt.17-09-2018
3/3
In view of the submission made above, the writ
petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
U
Chandeshwar Prasad
Krishnadeo Prasad
The State of Bihar
District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
