Dismissed

Manirul Islam and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Sept 2018CWJC/1535/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought a writ directing the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer to pay salaries intended for a teacher. The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction due to the availability of an alternative forum, granting liberty to move the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with liberty to move District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority within six weeks.

Manirul Islam and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1535 of 2015

¶2

===========================================================

¶3

Manirul Islam, Son of Amir Hussain, resident of village- Kolhan, P.O. Kharsauna, P.S. Azamnagar, District- Katihar.

¶4

Managing Committee of Madarsa Islamia at Kolhan, P.O. Kharsauna, P.S. Azamnagar, District- Katihar through its Secretary Md. Mustaque, son of Late Abdul Ghafar.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

The Special Director Secondary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Katihar. 4. The District Programme Officer, Katihar.

¶10

.... .... Respondent/s

¶11

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶12

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date: 18-09-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

¶15

The petitioners have moved the Court for the

¶16

following reliefs:

¶17

“That this application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ or orders, directing the respondent No. 3 and 5 the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer, Katihar for making payment of salary as fixed by the State Government to the petitioner no. 1, who has been duly appointed by the petitioner no. 2, the managing committee of the Madarsa Islamia at Kolhan, District- Katihar on the vacant and sanctioned post of Assistant teacher (Alim Unit) following all norms and Procedure for regular appointment as laid down by the State Government.”

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.1535 of 2015 dt.18-09-2018

¶19

2/2

¶20

After some arguments, in view of the objection raised by learned counsel for the State that an alternative forum is there for the petitioners to move prior to invoking the writ jurisdiction of the Court, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ application with liberty to move before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Katihar with regard to their present grievance.

¶21

Learned counsel for the State does not object.

¶22

In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

¶23

If an appeal is filed by the petitioner before the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Katihar within six weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided on merits expeditiously and within the statutory period.

¶24

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶25

P. Kumar

¶26

AFR/NAFR U

Manirul Islam and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manirul Islam and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonali Sen Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shobha Kumari and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sunita Kumari and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajendra Sharma, Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr. Onkareshwar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sujata Kumari and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.