unjustified, arbitrary and without any justification either on facts or in law. The sole reference of a post of Graduate Arts Teacher in the report of the Five Member Committee dated 06.09.2013, is also of no benefit to the authorities for the reason that in the meeting, initially they earmarked that post as a Graduate Arts Teacher but in the very report such earmarking itself is falsified as there is a definite letter number and date given of the order by which the post of Graduate Trained Science Teacher was shown in the school in question. Thus, the Five Member Committee on 06.09.2013, just noting that the post in the school in question was earmarked for Graduate Trained Arts Teacher is absolutely without any basis, much less, any justification. Moreover, when right from 1981 till September, 2012, the post has been filled up by a Graduate Trained Science Teacher, without any demur, objection or controversy being raised in this regard, the transfer of the petitioner to another school and posting of respondent on. 7, who is a Graduate Trained Arts Teacher on the sole post of Graduate Trained Teacher on 29.11.2012, in the school in question is totally unsustainable. The Court would note here that though there is a specific letter to indicate the existence of a post of Graduate Trained Science Teacher in the said school, but on the contrary there is nothing at all to show that the solitary post was of Graduate Trained Arts Teacher.
