Petitioner informed the court that the grievance was redressed, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The court disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13836 of 2016 (2) dt.16-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13836 of 2016
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap- GP2
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER
Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner informs that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed rendering the issue infructuous.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Jyoti Saran, J)
Bibhash/-
U
Kaushal Kishor
The State of Bihar through the Law Secretary
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
