Disposed

Md. Afroz Alam v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Dec 2018CWJC/13621/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order directs the District Education Officer, Araria, to enquire into the petitioner's claim for unpaid salary as a Head Moulvi in a recognized Madarsa and decide within four months, without expressing an opinion on the merit of the claim.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Education Officer to verify the petitioner's employment and the Madarsa's recognition and decide on the salary claim within four months.

Md. Afroz Alam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13621 of 2015

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Afroz Alam, Son of Haji Md. Safiruddin, R/o Village & Post - Banglakol Sapa, Bhuna,P.S. - Garbanali, District- Araria.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Araria.

¶10

The Chairman, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna. null null

¶11

The Secretary, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Patna.

¶12

Reyazuddin, Secretary Managing Committee, Madrasa Reyazululom Banglakol, Sapa P.O. - Raikamba, Jaagarh, District - Araria.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S Arshad Alam For the MadarsaBoard : Mr. Rashid Alam ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 04-12-2018

¶17

The instant writ petition has been filed for a direction

¶18

to the respondent authorities for making payment of salary to the petitioner. Grievance of the petitioner is that inspite of his working as Head Moulvi in Madarsa Reyazul Uloom, Bangalakol Sapa, District Araria, he is not being paid his salary.

¶19

The District Education Officer, Araria is required to enquire as to whether the petitioner is working as Head Moulvi in the Madarsa in question. On verification of record, if it is found that the petitioner has actually worked and the Madarsa is recognized one, he shall take steps for ensuring payment of salary to the petitioner.

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.13621 of 2015(2) dt.04-12-2018 2/2

¶21

It is made clear that the Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the claim of the petitioner. The District Education Officer, Araria is required to enquire into the matter and take appropriate decision on the claim of the petitioner. Necessary decision in this regard may be taken by the District Education Officer, Araria within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶22

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed

¶23

of.

¶24

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶25

mrl./-

¶26

Md. Afroz Alam v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Afroz Alam v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyan Shankar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vivekanand Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Ashik Hussain Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pradeep Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Birendra Kumar Lohara @ Birendra Kumar Mistri @ Birendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bharat Narayan Arun Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.