Patna HC disposed of a writ petition wherein it was reported that the encroachment in question had been removed, directing the respondent to ensure it does not re-surface.
Director respondent No.4 to ensure encroachment does not re-surface and take preventive action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12336 of 2017
======================================================
Bhagwan Singh
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr. AJAY -GA5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
4 29-01-2018
From the counter affidavit and the report, Annexure A, it is seen that the encroachment in the area in question has been removed.
In view of the above, for the present, we dispose of the matter directing respondent No.4 to ensure that the encroachment does not re-surface and take preventive action in case it takes place.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ)
( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
K.C.Jha/-
U
Bhagwan Singh
The State Of Bihar
Rajendra Menon
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
