Disposed

Jitendra Kumar Tiwary @ Bhikham Baba v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC28 Jun 2018CWJC/12027/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court directed the District Magistrate to inquire into allegations of tree felling and construction violations at a religious trust, suspending activities until the inquiry.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Magistrate to inquire into alleged violations by the statutory authority and ensure construction proceeds in accordance with law.

Jitendra Kumar Tiwary @ Bhikham Baba Vs The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12027 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Jitendra Kumar Tiwary @ Bhikham Baba, S/o- Late Keshwa Nand Tiwary, Resident of Village+P.O.- Aami, District- Saran (Chhapra).

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar

¶7

The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar

¶8

The Principal Secretary, Department of Tourism, Government of Bihar

¶9

Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Government of Bihar

¶10

President, Bihar State Religious Board of Trust through the Superintendent of Bihar State

¶11

Address:- Vidyapati Marg Trust, Patna- 800001.

¶12

Superintendent, Stte of Religious Trust Board, Patna, Vidyapati Marg, Patna- 800001. 7. The D.G.P., Bihar, Patna 8. I.G. Law & Orders, Bihar, Patna 9. S.S.P. Chhapra 10. Commissioner, Saran Division, Chhapra 11. D.M. Saran at Chhapra 12. S.D.O. Dighwara, District- Saran 13. Circle Officer, Dighwara, Saran at Chhapra

¶13

Forest Officer, Saran (Chhapra)

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Padma Deo Narayan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Lalit Kishore- AG For BSBRT : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Madan Mohan, Advocate Mrs. Pallavi Pandey, Advocate

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

¶19

and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶20

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶21

2 28-06-2018 In the matter of construction, as alleged in the writ petition, in the premises of the Trust in question, the allegation of the petitioner is that trees are being cut and the provisions of the Bihar Hindu Religious Trust Act, 1950 is being violated.

¶22

Respondent No. 5 the Statutory Authority has already

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.12027 of 2018(2) dt.28-06-2018 2/3

¶24

taken cognizance of the complaint and has written to the District Magistrate concerned Respondent No. 11 to proceed for taking action with regard to the complaint in accordance with law.

¶25

That being so, for the present, interest of justice would be met in case Respondent No. 11 the District Magistrate is directed to look into the matter and in case it is found that the statutory provisions including the Forest Act or any other provision is being violated in construction or felling of the trees, the District Magistrate is directed to proceed in the matter in accordance with law and ensure that no construction take place contrary to the requirement of law and construction is undertaken after obtaining permission from the Statutory Authority, as may be permissible. We expect the District Magistrate to take action within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order ensure that construction and felling of trees take place strictly in accordance with law. Before taking action in the matter the District Magistrate shall also issue notice to the persons concerned who are making the construction, hear them and thereafter proceed in accordance with law.

¶26

Till the District Magistrate does not conduct an inquiry as detailed hereinabove, all activities with regard to the

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.12027 of 2018(2) dt.28-06-2018 3/3

¶28

construction in question shall be kept in abeyance.

¶29

With the aforesaid, the matter stands disposed of.

¶30

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶31

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶32

P.K.P./-

¶33

Jitendra Kumar Tiwary @ Bhikham Baba v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Kumar Tiwary @ Bhikham Baba v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Divakar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bablu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s N C C Limited Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Mumtaj Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Krishna Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.