The Single Judge dismissed an inconsequential appeal filed under Civil Writ Jurisdiction as it became infructuous following the decree of the eviction suit by the court below.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11872 of 2015
======================================================
... ... Petitioner
Versus
Mahamaya Devi wife of Pitanber Jha, resident of Mohalla- Benta(Dr. C.D. Sinha campus) ward no -30, (Old) 43(New) P.S.- Laheriasarai, District Darbhanga.
... ... Respondent
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gayanand Roy, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER
From submission of learned counsel for the
petitioners, it appears that the eviction suit filed by the respondent has been decreed as per judgment dated 31.03.2016. On account of disposal of eviction suit by the court below, this appeal has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(Sanjay Kumar, J)
Harish/-
U
Arvind Choudhary @ Buchkun Choudhary and Usha Choudhary
Mahamaya Devi
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
