The High Court of Patna disposed of a writ application as infructuous, holding that the petitioner's grievance had been redressed during its pendency. The order was an oral order without substantive legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11629 of 2014
======================================================
Nawal Kumar, son of Shri Narayan Singh, resident of Village - Paipura Khurd, P.S. Rani Talab Kanpa, District - Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ga4- Ashok Priyadarshi For the S.S. Board : Mr. S. S. Sundram, Advocate
Mr. Shasank Shekhar Jha, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
2 18-09-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, during the pendency of the writ application.
In view of the above, the writ application is disposed of as having become infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Uday/-
U
Nawal Kumar
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Bihar
The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar
The Bihar Sanskrit Education Board
The District Education Officer, Patna
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
