Allowed

Manish Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Jul 2018CWJC/10898/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a writ petition seeking release of a seized vehicle connected to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The vehicle was directed to be released on furnishing a bank guarantee and undertaking not to alienate it.

What did the court decide?

Release of the seized vehicle (Piaggio Auto Rickshaw) upon furnishing a bank guarantee and undertaking to produce it and not alienate it.

Manish Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10898 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Manish Kumar Yadav, son of Shivanarayan Yadav, resident of VillageGarhbanaili, Ghordaur, P.S. Kasba, District Purnea.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department Govt. of Bihar.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Purnea.

¶8

The Superintendent of Police, Purnea.

¶9

The Officer, Incharge of Baisi Police Station, Purnea.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kr. Sinha- GA-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶13

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶14

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶15

2 04-07-2018

¶16

This writ petition has been filed for release of a vehicle (Piaggio Auto Ricksaw) (Tempo) bearing Engine No.RTC 2868693, Chesis No. MBX0003BFVD445802, which has been seized in connection with Baisi P.S. Case No. 201 of 2017 due to violation of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶17

It is common ground that in various cases, identical in nature, pending finalization of the confiscation proceedings vehicles have been directed to be released by this Court on various conditions and we see no reason to make a deviation in the present case.

¶18

Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is directed that pending

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.10898 of 2018(2) dt.04-07-2018 2/2

¶20

finalization of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case, the aforesaid vehicle in question shall be released to the petitioner on his furnishing the bank guarantee to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Purnea within a period of one week from the date of his furnishing the bank guarantee and further undertaking to produce the vehicle as and when directed by the authority concerned and not to alienate or deal with the vehicle in question during the pendency of the confiscation proceedings and criminal case so as to cause adverse effect or prejudice to the State Government.

¶21

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

¶22

(Rajendra Menon, CJ)

¶23

( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶24

Sunil/-

¶25

Manish Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Juli Devi Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Jag Jiwan Ram Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Kundan Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise, Bihar, Patna and Ors.