Single-judge oral order allowing petitioner leave to withdraw writ application with liberty to file fresh petition against different respondents. Application dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal issue decided.
Permission allowed to withdraw writ application with liberty to file fresh writ application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1085 of 2018
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D Sanjay (Addl. Soc. Gen.)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 10-09-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to file fresh writ application for the reason that grievance of the petitioner is against National Highways Authorities of India whereas this writ application has been filed against respondent Gas Authority of India Limited.
Prayer is allowed with the aforesaid liberty.
Accordingly, the writ application stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Mkr./-
U
Sima Devi @ Sima Vernamal
The Union of India
The Director the Deptt. of Petroleum and Natural Gas
The Joint Secretary
The Managing Director, Gail India Limited
The Competent authority Gail India Limited Company
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
