Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition to seek other legal remedies. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; the writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10845 of 2018
======================================================
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kinkar Kumar- Sc9
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 10-07-2018 After some arguments, Mr. Ansul, learned counsel
appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the instant writ petition in order to seek other remedies available in law.
Leave is granted. The writ petition is dismissed.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Pradeep/Sneha
U
Vijay Kumar Sinha
Ugam Tara Devi
Pramod Kumar
Shivlagan Rai
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary-cum-Industrial Commissioner, Government of Bihar
The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
