Disposed

Jagat Lal Yadav @ Jagat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretar

Patna HC3 May 2018CR. WJC/846/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted provisional release of a motorcycle seized in connection with an alleged liquor smuggling case, subject to conditions including a surety bond, undertaking regarding illegal use, and preservation of photographic evidence.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of the seized motorcycle within one week, conditional upon furnishing a surety bond of Rs.60,000 and complying with specified undertakings regarding the vehicle's use and evidence

Jagat Lal Yadav @ Jagat Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar… — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.846 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.846 of 2018

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jagat Lal Yadav @ Jagat Yadav, Son of Kari Yadav, Resident of villageManapatti, P.S.- Basopatti, District- Madhubani.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

¶10

The S.H.O. Basopatti Police Station, Madhubani.

¶11

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha (GA1)

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

¶14

Petitioner has prayed for release of the vehicle Passion Pro Motorcycle, bearing Reg. No.BR32Q-3578, which has been seized by the police in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No.210 of 2017, District-Madhubani for the offence under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is alleged that 16 liters of foreign liquor has been recovered from the vehicle in question.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶16

petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions

¶17

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.846 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018

¶18

which may be imposed by this Court for provisional release of the vehicle in question.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances, pending initiation or finalization of the confiscation proceeding, let the vehicle of the petitioner be released provisionally within one week from the date of production of proof of ownership and registration of the vehicle in favour of the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) Petitioner shall furnish surety bond of Rs.60,000/- (Sixty Thousand) (not in form of bank guarantee or cash) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of District Magistrate, Madhubani/authority concerned.

¶21

(ii) The petitioner shall also give an undertaking that he will not deal with the vehicle in question and shall not alienate or encumber the same creating any kind of adverse interest against the interest of the State, he will not use the vehicle for any illegal purpose and as and when required, he will produce the vehicle in question before the competent court/authority.

¶22

(iii) At the time of release, the concerned

¶23

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.846 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018

¶24

authority/court shall get prepared a photograph duly certified in presence of the petitioner and panchnama of the vehicle in question shall also be prepared and keep the same on record which may be used as secondary evidence.

¶25

(iv) Petitioner shall undertake not to challenge the said photograph and panchnama so prepared in his presence at the time of release of vehicle in question for use in course of trial or the confiscation proceeding, as the case may be.

¶26

The application stands disposed of.

¶27

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶28

Arvind/-

¶29

U T

Jagat Lal Yadav @ Jagat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagat Lal Yadav @ Jagat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandradeo Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sunil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mrs. Ranita Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kusum Devi @ Kusum Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar Through Its Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Old Secretar

Sanjay Kumar Diwakar Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

Setu Nath Poddar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Excise And Prohibition Department, Bihar, Patna and