Allowed

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise And Prohibition Department

Patna HC26 Sept 2018CR. WJC/2225/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought provisional release of a motorcycle seized for illicit liquor. Court ordered release upon furnishing sureties and undertaking to produce the vehicle.

What did the court decide?

Vehicle released on furnishing two sureties and submitting an undertaking not to deal with or encumber the vehicle.

What the court decided

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through The… — Execution and Attachment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2225 of 2018 Arising out of Complaint Case No.C-2/388 of 2018, District-Sitamarhi

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mukesh Kumar Son of Nagendra Sah, Resident of Village - Banchauri, Ward No. 7, Police Station - Dumra, District - Sitamarhi.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶6

The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

¶8

The Superintendent of Excise, Sitamarhi.

¶9

.... .... Respondents

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar(SC-11)

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 26-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

¶14

The petitioner is seeking provisional release of the vehicle Hero Honda Splendor Motorcycle bearing Reg.No.BR30T-8982, Chassis No.MBLHARO74JHEA2672, Engine No.HA10AGJHEF1889, which has been seized in connection with Complaint Case No.C-2/388 of 2018, registered for the offence under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for recovery of 1.260 liters illicit liquor from the vehicle in question.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions

¶16

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2225 of 2018 (2) dt.26-09-2018

¶17

¶18

which may be imposed by this Court for provisional release of the vehicle in question.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no confiscation proceeding has been initiated.

¶20

In view of the views expressed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court, considering the quantity of the illicit liquor being less than 30 liters, this Court would direct release of the vehicle in question on petitioner furnishing two sureties for the value of the vehicle in question as indicated in the insurance document to the satisfaction of the court below. Apart from the above, the petitioner shall be obliged to submit an undertaking before the learned court below that during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding he would not deal with the vehicle in question and shall not create any kind of encumbrance whatsoever and no third party right or interest shall be created. He would also undertake to produce the vehicle in question as and when required by the authority concerned.

¶21

Let the vehicle be released within a week after

¶22

submission of the two sureties as indicated above.

¶23

This application stands disposed off.

¶24

Arvind/Ved/U T

¶25

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise And Prohibition Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise And Prohibition Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishuni Devi @ Bishuni Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satinder Pal Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Mamta Kumari @ Mamta Gupta Vs Samant Kumar

Jagdish Chander @ Jagdish Chander Hooda Vs The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna and Ors.

Suresh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Registration Excise And Prohibition Deaprtment

Raju Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Deptt., Patna, Bihar and Ors.