The High Court at Patna, via an oral order, held that the filed writ application was misconceived. Consequently, the court determined that no relief could be granted and dismissed the petition.
No relief granted; writ application dismissed as misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1933 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1377 Year-2014 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE
District- Rohtas
======================================================
Umesh Seth son of Late Gulab Seth, resident of Mohalla- Jakki Sahid, Phulwaria, Post+ P.S.- Sasaram (Town), District Rohtas at present resident of Village and Post- Baraon, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Partha Sarthy ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
be granted in this writ application.
It is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
avin/-Ved/-
U
Umesh Seth
The State of Bihar
The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas
The Officer-incharge, Nokha Police Station, District- Rohtas
Nand Kishore Singh
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
