Petitioner sought directions against police authorities regarding her son, an accused who is missing. The court found the application lacked merit and dismissed it without passing any orders against the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1650 of 2018
===================================================
Pana Devi, Wife of Late Ramchandra Ray, Resident of Jafrabad Tok, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali- 844503 presently residing at Mohalla- Rikabganj, P.S.- Malsalami, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondents
===================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Nasrul Huda Khan (SC1)
===================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3. 24-09-2018
On going through the statement made therein it appears that son of the petitioner about whom it is stated that he is missing, is an accused in Malsalami P.S. Case No. 213/2007 for the offences alleged under Section 147/148/323/ 324/504/307/302 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act. He was on
bail but thereafter he is missing. The counter
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1650 of 2018 (3) dt.24-09-2018
2
affidavit says that he has become traceless as he was apprehending his conviction in the aforesaid case. It is further stated in the counter affidavit that against him even process under Section 83 & 83 of the Cr.P.C. have been issued and the police is in search of him.
In the given facts and circumstances of the case, this court sitting in its writ jurisdiction is not inclined to pass any order particularly the directions which the petitioner is looking for against the police authorities.
This Writ Application has no merit. It is dismissed, accordingly.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.)
Rajeev/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners claim regarding their son being a missing accused warrants directions against police authorities.
Pana Devi
The State of Bihar
The Inspector General of Police, Patna
The Deputy Inspector General Police, Patna
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna
The Superintendent of Police, Patna
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
