Disposed

Devanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Government Of Bihar, Pa

Patna HC11 May 2018CR. WJC/1131/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court ordered the police to urgently investigate a writ application alleging the forcible seizure of a truck by a finance company agent. The court directed the investigating officer to submit a report within 90 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the police to investigate the case and submit a report within 90 days.

Devanti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal… — Banking and Recovery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1131 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -612 Year- 2017 Thana –Maner Police Station District- PATNA

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Devanti Devi, Wife of Sri Surendra Singh, Resident of Village- Karsar, Police Station- Sonbarsa, Nawanagar, District- Buxar.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

¶10

The City S.P. Patna.

¶11

The S.D.P.O. Danapur District- Patna.

¶12

The S.H.O. Maner Police Station, District- Patna.

¶13

The Branch Manager, Sri Ram Transport Finance Company Limited Ara, Katira More, Ara, P.S. - Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur.

¶14

Harendra Son of Bharat Chaurasiya. Resident of Village- Kacchi Talab, Maner, Police StationManer, District- Patna.

¶15

Sri Jaynath Prasad, Son of Sri Hari Shankar Prasad, Resident of Village + Post- Mirganj, P.S.Mirganj, District- Ara.

¶16

L and T Finance Limited, L & T Huse, N.M. Marg, Ballard, East Mumbai- 400001.

¶17

Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Services Ltd. Ambedkar Chauk, Near Judge Kothi, Buxar Town Thana, District- Buxar.

¶18

.... .... Respondent/s

¶19

===========================================================

¶20

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad, SC-8

¶21

===========================================================

¶22

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT

¶23

Date: 11-05-2018

¶24

This writ application has been preferred seeking a direction to the police officer to investigate the case being Maner Police Station Case No.612 of 2017 dated 13.12.2017 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 385, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶25

The petitioner has narrated in the writ application that the truck in question has been forcibly taken away by the agent of the M/s Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited even though she has never taken any loan or financial assistance from the said Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited. Learned counsel representing the petitioner has pointed out that in fact the husband of the petitioner has purchased the truck which has been financed by M/s Sriram

¶26

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1131 of 2018 dt.11-05-2018

¶27

¶28

Transport Finance Company Limited and because of failure on the part of her husband to remit the monthly installments against the finance obtained by him, the vehicle of this petitioner has been forcibly taken away. It is submitted that this petitioner has not even stood as a guarantor with the loan obtained by her husband. The writ application points out some high-handedness on the part of the agent of M/s Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited in the matter of snatching and taking away the vehicle from the possession of the petitioner.

¶29

Since the petitioner has already lodged a First Information Report, it would be the duty of the police officer to investigate the case to find out the truth and for this purpose he will be required to act with some urgency so that if the grievance of the petitioner is found to be correct and the allegations are found to be true, appropriate remedial measures will be taken by the Investigating Officer well before the truck of the petitioner is dealt with or otherwise disposed by M/s Sriram Transport Finance Company Limited. The Investigating Officer shall take immediate action towards finding out the truth and submit his report in this regard within a period of 90 days from today in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the correctness of the statements made by the petitioner and it is left open for the Investigating Officer to find out the truth.

¶30

The writ application stands disposed of.

¶31

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶32

Arvind/R.R.Ojha
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N/A
UploadingDate 15.05.2018
Transmission Date 15.05.2018

Devanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Government Of Bihar, Pa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Government Of Bihar, Pa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesh Patel and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar, Through Its Chief Secretary, Bihar Patna and Ors.

Perwez Alam Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Director General Cum Inspector General Of Police, Patna and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Singh @ Vijay Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Binod Kr. Jha Vs The State Of Bihar, Through Director General Of Police and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Forest And Environment, Bihar

Umesh Prasad Yadav Vs State of Bihar and Ors.